WHAT IS THE LAW

The set of questions that a lawyer usually asks himself is specific to other teachings. In my opinion, these questions are as follows:
(a) what IS WHAT IT is;
(b) what are the conditions;
(c) what the effects are;
(d) on what basis it has such premises;
(e) on what basis it has such effects;
(f) when there are indications of this and when the effects have occurred;
(g) which we use over time to assess this and to assess the impact.

There is no fundamental question in the lawyer’s question set: WHY. This is the case in philosophy and physics, whose fundamental questions are:

1. why you can not destroy energy ( And the principle of thermodynamics);
2. why there is no more negative temperature than minus 273 degrees Celsius (II principle of thermodynamics);
3. why entropy (state of disorder) increases (3rd principle of thermodynamics);
4. why is there anything other than God himself (I. Luria);
5. why is there anything rather than nothing (G. W. Leibniz);
6. why what it can’t be, however, is (A. N. Whitehead);

The answer to all these questions can be reduced to a common thesis in the field of logic: “If the world did not have a substance, then whether a given sentence makes sense would depend on whether a certain other sentence is true.” (L. Wittgenstein).