Methodology

A big question mark for me was the methodology of science. Why is it done in a given science and not differently, and in another science it is done differently and not so. Let me give you an example: In biology lessons, we learned the structure and operation of different systems: respiratory system, skeletal system, circulatory system, digestive system and excretion system. We then compared these systems in different animals: mammals and birds, mammals and reptiles, and so on.

The methodology of biology was not to compare the circulatory system with the skeletal system. In law studies, we learned to compare the disciplines of law among ourselves.

So we discussed the differences and similarities in that: we compared the law in kind with the bond law, civil law with administrative law, criminal law with civil law, private law with public law, and so on. Why so. Why the methodology of biology is not to compare the differences between the sense of vision and the sense of hearing: hearing (ear) does not have a field of vision only the field of hearing, hearing does not distinguish between colors only sounds, the organ of hearing are not the eyes only there are ears and so on. Is this methodological rule not about the law because the law does not exist in this way and we do not use it like the eyes or for any other reason.