Restitutio in Integrum

E. E. Pritchard describes the beliefs of the African People in the book “The Religion of the Nuer”: “When God created man, he took a piece of thy way and threw it into the water to induce man that he should always be RIGHTEOUS, just as the shell always floats on the water. He then sent an unenchieed or divorced woman to men to tell them that they would live forever. But the woman passing the message, threw into the water – instead of another piece of gouth – a piece of CLAY vessel, which sank.

Although this incident was accidental, what happened was already irreversible and the consequences of this people must already bear regardless of whether this action was intentional or not. According to Nuer, the whole human race suffers from something that was nothing more than a BANAL OMEN.” The foreeparables have the same consequences and are just as irreversible as even serious crimes. For the victim, it is a palless consolation that no one took away his health or property intentionally only by trivial foretime in the operation of ANONYMOUS systems, for which individually no one is responsible.

Shouldn’t there be a RULE of civil law liability on a risk basis for damage to the PERSON (and the burden of proof pass on to the offender)? I have been asking myself this question for 25 years. I will be grateful for your feedback.