Clear

Home » The art of the process » Art of Litigation » Clear

Everyone has their own way of presenting their own thoughts. Here are some of the writing rules I have in mind (although I don’t follow them meticulously enough; not everything I write myself either):

  1. at the beginning of each letter we write a short introduction: “What do we mean” (I call it “garda”);
  2. figures and statements of persons, etc. are presented in tables;
  3. the chronology of events is shown on the timeline or in the tables;
  4. we only use the active site, and we do not use the passive side;
  5. in each sentence as an entity we use this noun, which is the determining factor;
  6. we do not use the phrase “it seems that…”;
  7. we do not use the term “is incomprehensible..”, (we indicate what is “incomprehensible something);
  8. we do not use the term “A represents B” (we write in the worst case scenario: “A is B”), but rather avoid the word “is”;
  9. we formulate a sentence so that it is clear whether it is an individual designation or a general designation (in English it is sometimes dealt with by an indefinite and defined article);
  10. when we refer to a situation, a judgment, an event, etc., we formulate a sentence so that it is clear whether we are referring to:
    (a) the situation, etc.,
    (b) the situation, etc. in another case
    (c) some view (whose);
  11. we care about the subject and rheumatism.
Also check
other threads in this category

Staroń & Partners sp. k.
ul. Marszałkowska 111
00-102 Warszawa

e-mail: office@staronpartners.com
phone: +48 601 453 000

Staroń & Partners - radca prawny Piotr Staroń
Przewiń na górę