Last sentence

Mr Miller said the man is known not after he starts, but when he finishes. The delegate is recognized after the end of the processes. However, only seemingly something explains it, because in each process there are two sides, so the winning cases are exactly as many as the losers. Isn’t it that:
(a) the outcome of the process is as it was known from the beginning
(b) a good representative is one who knows how to be at a good beginning.

The last sentence of a philosophical work, etc., can shed the most light on everything that has been said in the content of the work. It is known that the last sentence “Ferdydurke” reads: “End and bomb, and who read this tromba.” The meaning of the PENULTIMATE sentence of the “Treaty” is similar. L. Wittgenstein: “My thesis is clear that whoever understands me will eventually reject it as ridiculous.” The last sentence of the Treaty, which is a summary of everything that the author tries to express throughout the Treaty, says the most: “What cannot be talked about, this must be silenced”.

As you know, S. I. Witkiewicz ineptly sparoded Wittgenstein by saying, “What can not be silenced, this must be talked about.” J. Korab-Karpowicz also reshaped this idea in the work “Political-Philosophical Treaty” written in its entirety against Wittgenstein.