True

The witness and the party are to testify truthfully. But not like PILATE, who asked, “What is the TRUTH?”. The dispute stemmed from the fact that the SUPPLIER and the CONSIGNEE kept records of purchases which showed different quantities and different delivery values: (a) the supplier issued invoices for deliveries, but not immediately (b) the supplier recorded the deliveries in the computer system (d) the consignee recorded the deliveries in manual records.

Invoices, computer records and handwritten records differed in significant value. The computer system showed a much higher value. The person interviewed for the vendor testified as follows: Proxy: “Did the computer records match the invoices issued”? Page: “I CAN’T IMAGINE it might be incompatible.” Agent: “Were deliveries checked in to the computer system actually delivered to the buyer”? Page: “I CAN’T IMAGINE they might be undelivered.”

Agent: “At what point were the records made in the computer records and at what point in the delivery”? Page: “I CAN’T IMAGINE they could be done at different times.” According to alfred Tarski’s correspondence definition of truth: the phrase “It snows” is true when it snows. And I know it too, but unfortunately I don’t understand it.