Uriah Heep

Home » The art of the process » Art of Litigation » Uriah Heep

Uriah Heep is an extremely intriguing character from the book “David Copperfield”. From her took the name of the band “Uriah Heep” with the sensational song “July Morning”, which my younger daughter considered the number 1 when she was 8 years old (now no longer – she is 19 years old). Uriah Heep often spoke to David Copperfield, but he did so in such a way that when he spoke, he did not look at David and address him, but used the formula of “man should not do this” or “man should not behave like that.” And in this formula, the word “man” was meant to mean David.

My relative uses the word “man” differently. Whenever she addresses her husband, she does not speak to her husband or by name, but:
– “Man, you can not mow the grass only in these places!!”
– “Man, you can’t store coal right at the
entrance to the garage!!!”
– “Man, think a little!!!”

The following rule would follow: when you say to a man that he is human, you do not say the word “man” to him. And when you say to a man that he is not a man, then the word “man” you speak to him. What is the key to understanding is contained in default intents and contexts that are never part of a utterance? https://lnkd.in/etcSwAY

Also check
other threads in this category

Staroń & Partners sp. k.
ul. Marszałkowska 111
00-102 Warszawa

e-mail: office@staronpartners.com
phone: +48 601 453 000

Staroń & Partners - radca prawny Piotr Staroń
Przewiń na górę